Dodging An Economic Bullet

Keywords: , , ,

So the majority party in the Senate believes that the best way to bring down gas prices is to impose a “windfall profits tax” on oil companies–this despite the fact that the tax will eventually be passed on to consumers. It also wants to legislate against “price-gouging,” whatever that is. Good thing this feel-good/do-nothing bill went down to defeat. The reasons why that defeat was deserved can be found here. This is an old article, but as it turns out, it is still applicable.

Incidentally, when will we have a “windfall profits tax” imposed on farmers? It makes just as much sense as imposing such a tax on oil companies.

So the majority party in the Senate believes that the best way to bring down gas prices is to impose a "windfall profits tax" on oil companies--this despite the fact that the tax will eventually be passed on to consumers. It also wants to legislate against "price-gouging," whatever that is. Good thing this feel-good/do-nothing bill went down to defeat. The reasons why that defeat was deserved can be ... Read More

Obvious Story Of The Day

Keywords: , , ,

Did they really, really need to conduct this survey?

BALTIMORE, June 10 (UPI) — Mothers of twins seldom get the recommended full night’s sleep and often suffer from depression, U.S. researchers said.

A U.S. researcher found the mothers of twins sleep an average of 5.4 hours in a 24-hour period, rather than the recommended 7-8 hours. Almost half of the mothers reported mild to severe symptoms of depression.

“As primary caregivers for families, mothers caring for twins experience enormous workload, extreme exhaustion and limited time to meet their own needs,” study author Dr. Elizabeth Damato of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland said in a statement.

“Additionally, mothers of twins are likely to be caring for babies that are premature … Meeting the increased demands of two premature infants places mothers at risk for sleep deprivation.”

They’re depressed because they’re not getting any sleep. I’m sure you could get the same findings if you studied mothers (or fathers) of colicky babies as well.

I’ll give the survey authors another idea; mothers of twins who have a third child find that having a single baby after twins is much easier than having twins…

Did they really, really need to conduct this survey? BALTIMORE, June 10 (UPI) -- Mothers of twins seldom get the recommended full night's sleep and often suffer from depression, U.S. researchers said. A U.S. researcher found the mothers of twins sleep an average of 5.4 hours in a 24-hour period, rather than the recommended 7-8 hours. Almost half of the mothers reported mild to severe symptoms of depression. "As primary caregivers for families, mothers caring for twins experience enormous workload, extreme exhaustion and ... Read More

Tempest, Meet Teapot

Keywords: , , , , , ,

Evidently, there is a campaign focused on taking tiny little snippets of statements John McCain has made and making McCain look utterly cruel and heartless as a result of those snippets. This game must be amusing for about five minutes–seven, tops–but after a while, one wonders what is to be gained by it. Other than misleading the electorate, of course.

The latest would-be kerfuffle involves Democrats howling over McCain supposedly saying that “it’s not too important” when American troops come home from Iraq. Problem is that these charges utterly and completely misses the context of the McCain statement:

McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said: “The Obama campaign is embarking on a false attack on John McCain to hide their own candidate’s willingness to disregard facts on the ground in pursuit of withdrawal no matter what the costs. John McCain was asked if he had a `better estimate’ for a timeline for withdrawal.

The exchange that has Democrats licking their chops began when co-host Matt Lauer asked about the surge strategy in Iraq: “If it’s working Senator, do you now have a better estimate of when American forces can come home from Iraq?”

McCain replied: “No, but that’s not too important. What’s important is the casualties in Iraq, Americans are in South Korea, Americans are in Japan, American troops are in Germany. That’s all fine. American casualties and the ability to withdraw; we will be able to withdraw. General [David] Petraeus is going to tell us in July when he thinks we are.

But the key to it is that we don’t want any more Americans in harm’s way. That way, they will be safe, and serve our country and come home with honor and victory, not in defeat, which is what Senator Obama’s proposal would have done. I’m proud of them. And they’re doing a great job. And we are succeeding and it’s fascinating that Senator Obama still doesn’t realize that.”

(Emphasis mine.) As the quote makes clear, McCain’s concern is to ensure the safety of the troops–an objective that is far more important than any specific timetable for withdrawal.

Bizarrely and offensively, however, the Obama campaign and its surrogates have decided to try to portray McCain as not caring about the welfare of the troops. This is both entirely inaccurate when one considers the context of the McCain statements and entirely offensive when one considers McCain’s wartime heroism and the fact that his life experience alone has caused him to care more about the state of the military and the welfare of the troops than most of his peers in public service. War heroes deserve–if nothing else–the benefit of the doubt on these kinds of issues and McCain’s public life has made clear that he takes a backseat to no one in his concern for the troops.

So much for this “New Tone” I keep hearing about. And in a just world, when people think that the only way they can win a Presidential election is by deliberately misconstruing John McCain’s statements, it should say more about McCain’s would-be critics than it does about him. The actual facts surrounding McCain’s comment are crystal clear even if their portrayal by the Obama campaign and its surrogates is not.

Evidently, there is a campaign focused on taking tiny little snippets of statements John McCain has made and making McCain look utterly cruel and heartless as a result of those snippets. This game must be amusing for about five minutes--seven, tops--but after a while, one wonders what is to be gained by it. Other than misleading the electorate, of course. The latest would-be kerfuffle involves Democrats howling over McCain ... Read More

NBC/WSJ Poll: Obama Up By 6

Keywords: , , ,

Things are looking very good for Barack Obama 5 months out from election day according to the new NBC News/Wall St. Journal Poll (1000 RVs, 6/6-9, MOE +/- 4%.) While Barack Obama has led John McCain in this survey ever since March, post-primary, Barack Obama now leads John McCain by 6 points.


Candidate June April March
Obama 47 46 44
McCain 41 43 42

Looking at the demographic breakdown, Barack Obama does well among those groups traditionally seen as both his own core base of support as well as Hillary Clinton’s:

In the head-to-head matchup, Obama leads McCain among African Americans (83-7 percent), Hispanics (62-28), women (52-33), Catholics (47-40), independents (41-36) and even blue-collar workers (47-42). Obama is also ahead among those who said they voted for Clinton in the Democratic primaries (61-19)…Obama has a seven-point advantage (46-39) among all white women.

So why is this thing even as close as it is? White dudes.

Yet among white men — who made up 36 percent of the electorate in the 2004 presidential election — Obama trails McCain by 20 points, 55-35 percent.

Now, it should be noted that even with what looks like a solid percentage of Clinton’s supporters on board with Obama, adding Hillary Clinton to the ticket is a big plus, getting the Democratic ticket up above the 50% mark, poised for a landslide victory in November.


Candidate June
Obama/Clinton 51
McCain/Romney 42

The key: the noncommital voters categorized as “not sure,” “other” or “depends” break overwhelmingly for Obama/Clinton.

Tags: 2008 presidential election, barack obama, john mccain, hillary clinton, nbc news, wall st. journal poll (all tags)

Things are looking very good for Barack Obama 5 months out from election day according to the new NBC News/Wall St. Journal Poll (1000 RVs, 6/6-9, MOE +/- 4%.) While Barack Obama has led John McCain in this survey ever since March, post-primary, Barack Obama now leads John McCain by 6 points. CandidateJuneAprilMarch Obama474644 McCain414342 Looking at the demographic breakdown, Barack Obama does well among those groups traditionally seen as both his own core base of ... Read More

Rush Limbaugh’s cousin appointed to federal bench.

Keywords: , , , , ,

Today, Steven Limbaugh Jr., cousin of right-wing radio host Rush Limbaugh, was confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Eastern Missouri. President Bush nominated Steven Limbaugh to the position in December. As ThinkProgress has noted, the Bush administration has close ties to Rush Limbaugh, granting him access to Tony Snow, Condoleezza Rice, […]

Today, Steven Limbaugh Jr., cousin of right-wing radio host Rush Limbaugh, was confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Eastern Missouri. President Bush nominated Steven Limbaugh to the position in December. As ThinkProgress has noted, the Bush administration has close ties to Rush Limbaugh, granting him access to Tony Snow, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, and Vice President Cheney. Last fall, Limbaugh was treated to his own private confab with Bush. (HT: Crooks and Liars) Read More

McCain in ‘05: I’m ‘totally in agreement’ with Bush on ‘the most important issues of the day.’

Keywords: , , , , ,

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is working hard to dispel the notion that his presidency would effectively constitute a third Bush term, saying recently that he has “disagreed strongly with the Bush administration” on Iraq. But McCain took a very different stance in June 2005 when he told Tim Russert that he has “been totally […]

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is working hard to dispel the notion that his presidency would effectively constitute a third Bush term, saying recently that he has “disagreed strongly with the Bush administration” on Iraq. But McCain took a very different stance in June 2005 when he told Tim Russert that he has “been totally in agreement and support of President Bush” on “the transcendent issues“: RUSSERT: The fact is you are different than George Bush. SEN. McCAIN: No. No. I–the fact is that ... Read More

In Debate Over Permanent Bases In Iraq, U.S. Seeks Authorization For War In Iran

Keywords: , , , , , ,

The ongoing negotiations between Iraqi leaders and the Bush administration over the future role of the military occupation “have turned into an increasingly acrimonious public debate.”
The Bush administration’s demand for 58 permanent bases in Iraq — a near doubling of the current 30 bases — are causing Iraqis to warn that the status of forces […]

The ongoing negotiations between Iraqi leaders and the Bush administration over the future role of the military occupation “have turned into an increasingly acrimonious public debate.” The Bush administration’s demand for 58 permanent bases in Iraq — a near doubling of the current 30 bases — are causing Iraqis to warn that the status of forces agreement would be “more abominable than the occupation.” The administration is reportedly holding hostage “some $50bn of Iraq’s money in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ... Read More

Conservatives Complain GOP’s Earmark Plan Doesn’t Go Far Enough

Keywords: , , , , , , ,

As House Republicans unveiled their economic agenda today, conservatives expressed disappointment that it does nothing to address earmark reform now and instead calls for an “immediate moratorium” in the future. The document was drafted to lay out the GOP’s agenda in January 2009 if Republicans reclaim control of the House.

Earmark critics, however, say that view is completely unrealistic. They think a total ban on earmarks must be instituted today because the chances of Republicans taking back the House are slim. “We need to lead by example and differentiate ourselves,” a conservative staffer told me. “The economic agenda today will allow earmarks this year and the next if Republicans do not win the House. No fundamental change from the status quo.”

The struggle over earmarks is reflected in the differing views of two GOP leaders: Republican Study Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) and Policy Chairman Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.). The Hill reported the conflict earlier this week with Hensarling demanding action now and McCotter opposed to a “one-size-fits-all ban.” In a memo released this afternoon, Hensarling reiterated his support for a ban. He could press the issue by bringing it to a conference-wide vote.

As I reported on RedState last night, the GOP’s economic agenda includes many conservative proposals, including a flat tax, free-market health care, entitlement reform, balanced budget and energy production. Yet earmarks remain a sticking point despite Minority Leader John Boehner’s attempt to reach a consensus.

Conservatives don’t dispute the laudable policy goals included as part of the economic agenda — many developed by the Republican Study Committee. But that’s no excuse to take a pass on earmark reform today. Although it remains a divisive issue for Republicans, Hensarling should keep fighting for a ban on pork-barrel projects. Boehner faces no easy task bringing the GOP together, but he should view this as an opportunity for the GOP to distinguish itself from Democrats in advance of November’s elections.

Hensarling’s memo to Republican Study Committee members is below.

Dear RSC Colleague—

Conference Leadership has just unveiled its Economic Reform Agenda. Incorporated within that agenda are all of the relevant points of the RSC’s 8-point Action Plan save one. For those who worked so hard on the RSC plan, I congratulate you. I believe it was an important contribution and catalyst to the Conference’s plan, and I ask that you thank Leader Boehner for incorporating most of our Action Plan.

The portion of the plan not included, as of now, is the call for an immediate and unilateral earmark moratorium to be enacted today. As you have heard me state before, without action today, I fear the American people will never learn our party has called for a moratorium, while the Democrats stand for business as usual on pork-barrel spending. I know there are a number of legitimate issues to be resolved, and I hope we can resolve them soon.

For your information, some press reports concerning the RSC’s role in this situation are misleading. To make it clear, most of our membership believe it will probably prove necessary to discuss and resolve this issue at a special conference to be scheduled soon. What is accurate, as described by CQ Today, is that, “Boehner and Hensarling were working to find ways to persuade more Republicans, to join them in taking a ‘no earmarks’ pledge.”

We will speak more of this at today’s meeting, and I again thank you for your help in this effort.

Yours respectfully,

JEB HENSARLING

Chairman of the Republican Study Committee

As House Republicans unveiled their economic agenda today, conservatives expressed disappointment that it does nothing to address earmark reform now and instead calls for an "immediate moratorium" in the future. The document was drafted to lay out the GOP's agenda in January 2009 if Republicans reclaim control of the House. Earmark critics, however, say that view is completely unrealistic. They think a total ban on earmarks must be instituted ... Read More

Boehner blames ‘left-wing bloggers’ for impeachment efforts.

Keywords: , , , , ,

On Monday, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced 35 articles of impeachment against President Bush. Today, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) dismissed the call for impeachment as the efforts of “left-wing bloggers“:
This is just another example of the Democratic leadership in the House indulging trivial and silly conspiracy theories from left-wing bloggers, […]

On Monday, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced 35 articles of impeachment against President Bush. Today, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) dismissed the call for impeachment as the efforts of “left-wing bloggers“: This is just another example of the Democratic leadership in the House indulging trivial and silly conspiracy theories from left-wing bloggers, rather than working with Republicans to deal with the real issues facing the American people. But impeachment is more popular than Boehner would like to admit. A July ... Read More

LA Times: “Oh No You Dih Ent”

Keywords: , , , , , , ,

The McCain campaign held a conference call this afternoon with reporters, discussing the latest example of Democrats hilariously trying to excerpt McCain in order to make him look out of the loop on Iraq.

I don’t know who keeps telling the DNC this is a worthwhile effort, but it is sort of like putting David Beckham on TV to claim Carolina Panther Steve Smith doesn’t know anything about football. You’re not even talking the same sport Senator Obama. McCain is discussing a successful surge, you are discussing a quagmire. He’s in 2008, you’re in 1968. He’s talking football, you mean soccer.

During the conference call, Senator Joe Lieberman said that it was particularly nasty to question whether John McCain understands the sacrifices of military families, considering his father, his own experiences, and his son’s service.

Read on …

More than most any American, Sen. McCain knows the sacrifices that our men and women in uniform make and the burden that their families bear, and it really is wrong to suggest otherwise. Obviously he knows that from his own—from his father’s service and the impact it had on his family; from his own service and incarceration; from his eight visits to Iraq — on which I’ve been with him on a lot of them — and interacting with our troops there; and of course from the fact that his son was deployed to Iraq.”

The LA Times quickly jumped on this. The “reporter” began by saying that Sen. McCain has made a point of not discussing his son and not making a political issue of his service. She then said she was surprised, therefore, to hear Lieberman mention that McCain has a son in the military, and should we expect that, from now on, McCain surrogates will be using his son’s service to score political points.

So that’s the strategy?

LA TIMES: “McCain doesn’t understand what it’s like to have family in Iraq”

MCCAIN CAMPAIGN: “Well, you know, his son …”

LA TIMES [interrupting]: “bup bup bup, no no no, Senator McCain said he wouldn’t use his son for political purposes. Why is he exploiting his son like this? Does he hate the military? Didn’t he fire laser cannons from orbit during the Vietnam war anyway?”

They’ve posted it at their blog, under the hilarious title “Joe Lieberman makes political issue of John McCain’s son” which ought to take some sort of award home, either for Teh Most Overblown Blog Title or maybe Most Pathetic Gotcha Evah!. (Blog awards should have hip spelling.)

I suppose it shouldn’t come as a surprise. This is the same LA Times that thought McCain’s military pension made him unfit for duty. When you’re being echoed by the likes of DailyKos and the internet abomination americablog, you aren’t exactly topping the credibility lists.

So this is your warning from LA, Senator McCain: You have no son.

The McCain campaign held a conference call this afternoon with reporters, discussing the latest example of Democrats hilariously trying to excerpt McCain in order to make him look out of the loop on Iraq. I don't know who keeps telling the DNC this is a worthwhile effort, but it is sort of like putting David Beckham on TV to claim Carolina Panther Steve Smith doesn't know anything about football. You're not even talking the same sport Senator Obama. McCain is discussing a ... Read More